Two questions are raised by Marx's work: First, Are his laws of historical development true? Second, Is Socialism desirable? The second of these questions is quite independent of the first.Marx professes to prove that Socialism must come, but scarcely concerns himself to argue that when it comes it will be a good thing.It may be, however, that if it comes, it will be a good thing, even though all Marx's arguments to provethat it must come should be at fault.In actual fact, time has shown many flaws in Marx's theories.The development of the world has been sufficiently like his prophecy to prove him a man of very unusual penetration, but has not been sufficiently like to make either political or economic history exactly such as he predicted that it would be.Nationalism, so far from diminishing, has increased, and has failed to be conquered by the cosmopolitan tendencies which Marx rightly discerned in finance.Although big businesses have grown bigger and have over a great area reached the stage of monopoly, yet the number of shareholders in such enterprises is so large that the actual number of individuals interested in the capitalist system has continually increased.Moreover, though large firms have grown larger, there has been a simultaneous increase in firms of medium size.Meanwhile the wage-earners, who were, according to Marx, to have remained at the bare level of subsistence at which they were in the England of the first half of the nineteenth century, have instead profited by the general increase of wealth, though in a lesser degree than the capitalists.The supposed iron law of wages has been proved untrue, so far as labor in civilized countries is concerned.If we wish now to find examples of capitalist cruelty analogous to those with which Marx's book is filled, we shall have to go for most of our material to the Tropics, or at any rate to regions where there are men of inferior races to exploit.Again: the skilled worker of the present day is an aristocrat in the world of labor.It is a question with him whether he shall ally himself with the unskilled worker against the capitalist, or with the capitalist against the unskilled worker.Very often he is himself a capitalist in a small way, and if he is not so individually, his trade union or his friendly society is pretty sure to be so.Hence the sharpness of the class war has not been maintained.There are gradations, intermediate ranks between rich and poor, instead of the clear-cut logical antithesis between the workers who have nothing and the capitalists who have all.Even in Germany, which became the home of orthodox Marxianism and developed a powerful Social-Democratic party, nominally accepting the doctrine of``Das Kapital'' as all but verbally inspired, even there the enormous increase of wealth in all classes in the years preceding the war ledSocialists to revise their beliefs and to adopt an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary attitude.Bernstein, a German Socialist who lived long in England, inaugurated the ``Revisionist'' movement which at last conquered the bulk of the party.His criticisms of Marxian orthodoxy are set forth in his ``Evolutionary Socialism.''[9] Bernstein's work, as is common in Broad Church writers, consists largely in showing that the Founders did not hold their doctrines so rigidly as their followers have done.There is much in the writings of Marx and Engels that cannot be fitted into the rigid orthodoxy which grew up among their disciples.Bernstein's main criticisms of these disciples, apart from such as we have already mentioned, consist in a defense of piecemeal action as against revolution.He protests against the attitude of undue hostility to Liberalism which is common among Socialists, and he blunts the edge of the Internationalism which undoubtedly is part of the teachings of Marx.The workers, he says, have a Fatherland as soon as they become citizens, and on this basis he defends that degree of nationalism which the war has since shown to be prevalent in the ranks of Socialists.He even goes so far as to maintain that European nations have a right to tropical territory owing to their higher civilization.Such doctrines diminish revolutionary ardor and tend to transform Socialists into a left wing of the Liberal Party.But the increasing prosperity of wage-earners before the war made these developments inevitable.Whether the war will have altered conditions in this respect, it is as yet impossible to know.Bernstein concludes with the wise remark that: ``We have to take working men as they are.And they are neither so universally paupers as was set out in the Communist Manifesto, nor so free from prejudices and weaknesses as their courtiers wish to make us believe.''
同类推荐
热门推荐
重回九零她靠科研暴富了
秦红绯一眼醒来回到了穿越前1999那年拿了一手烂牌,开局死了爹,亲妈疯疯癫癫拉仇恨无数,继承家里小店欠债上百万,爷爷不疼奶奶不爱,姐姐早早辍学混娱乐圈被黑的体无完肤,谁都来踩一脚。没关系,凭借穿越二十多年科研的经验,接掌了家里的维修小店。修电器吗?五百一次,坏了赔十倍。修着修着不小心出了名,大家都知道秦怀街有个维修铺,总有人花钱要插队,一开始是电子商老板,后来是央城某高科技人员,——为什么连经常被求着报纸都采访不到的某高级学院的教授都亲自来了??遇秦红绯前,唐今南的老师说女人都是成长路上的绊脚石,来一个劈一个,遇上秦红绯后,唐今南发现,老师他误人子弟。最美的时光遇见了最好的你
在她朦胧的青春里,她遇见了他们,让她哭笑不得,但还是命运捉摸,她弄丢了他们;她遇见了她们,在她哭的时候,她们会帮她擦眼泪,在她笑的时候,她们会陪着她一起笑。在她的青春里发生了什么呢?其实她也不知道发生了什么,但她知道,那是她最开心的时光!倾城之恋:我依然在等你
曾经,她爱他,爱得刻骨铭心。曾经,他们约定,三年后,共结白首,然而,三年后,才知道什么叫做沧海桑田。她为了实现他去美国读研的梦想,背着他,做了小三,他学成归来,创办了自己的企业,但她明白,他们之间的爱情早已经面目全非了。既然做不成你的妻子,那么,就让我在你身边做一个爱你却不能拥有你的红颜。周鹏,盛世集团的总裁,结婚多年未有子嗣,一纸合同,她做了他的小三,为他生育,却得到了谎言。最后,命运还是给了她一个真心疼惜她的男人,和,一个没有喝过她的奶却与她母子相认的孩子。林初年,这一世,注定了是你欠了我的,我爱得好苦也好痛,所以,我来世不要再见你。