Efforts to Start Southern Industries Fail.-A few of them,seeing the pre-dominance of the North,made determined efforts to introduce manufactures into the South.To the leaders who were averse to secession and nullification this seemed the only remedy for the growing disparity in the power of the two sections.Societies for the encouragement of mechanical industries were formed,the investment of capital was sought,and indeed a few mills were built on Southern soil.The results were meager.The natural resources,coal and water power,were abundant;but the enterprise for direction and the skilled labor were wanting.The stream of European immigration flowed North and West,not South.The Irish or German laborer,even if he finally made his home in a city,had before him,while in the North,the alternative of a homestead on Western land.To him slavery was a strange,if not a repelling,institution.He did not take to it kindly nor care to fix his home where it flourished.While slav-ery lasted,the economy of the South was inevitably agricultural.While agricul-ture predominated,leadership with equal necessity fell to the planting interest.While the planting interest ruled,political opposition to Northern economy was destined to grow in strength.
The Southern Theory of Sectionalism.-In the opinion of the statesmen who frankly represented the planting interest,the industrial system was its deadly enemy.Their entire philosophy of American politics was summed up in a single paragraph by McDuffie,a spokesman for South Carolina:"Owing to the federative character of our government,the great geographical extent of our territory,and the diversity of the pursuits of our citizens in different parts of the union,it has so happened that two great interests have sprung up,standing di-rectly opposed to each other.One of these consists of those manufactures which the Northern and Middle states are capable of producing but which,owing to the high price of labor and the high profits of capital in those states,cannot hold competition with foreign manufactures without the aid of bounties,directly or indirectly given,either by the general government or by the state governments.The other of these interests consists of the great agricultural staples of the Southern states which can find a market only in foreign countries and which can be advantageously sold only in exchange for foreign manufactures which come in competition with those of the Northern and Middle states....These in-terests then stand diametrically and irreconcilably opposed to each other.The interest,the pecuniary interest of the Northern manufacturer,is directly pro-moted by every increase of the taxes imposed upon Southern commerce;and it is unnecessary to add that the interest of the Southern planter is promoted by every diminution of taxes imposed upon the productions of their industry.If,under these circumstances,the manufacturers were clothed with the power of imposing taxes,at their pleasure,upon the foreign imports of the planter,no doubt would exist in the mind of any man that it would have all the characteris-tics of an absolute and unqualified despotism."The economic soundness of this reasoning,a subject of interesting speculation for the economist,is of little con-cern to the historian.The historical point is that this opinion was widely held in the South and with the progress of time became the prevailing doctrine of the planting statesmen.
Their antagonism was deepened because they also became convinced,on what grounds it is not necessary to inquire,that the leaders of the industrial interest thus opposed to planting formed a consolidated "aristocracy of wealth,"bent upon the pursuit and attainment of political power at Washington."By the aid of various associated interests,"continued McDuffie,"the manufacturing capitalists have obtained a complete and permanent control over the legislation of Congress on this subject [the tariff]....Men confederated together upon selfish and interested principles,whether in pursuit of the offices or the bounties of the government,are ever more active and vigilant than the great majority who act from disinterested and patriotic impulses.Have we notwitnessed it on this floor,sir?Who ever knew the tariff men to divide on any question affecting their confederated interests?...The watchword is,stick together,right or wrong upon every question affecting the common cause.Such,sir,is the concert and vigilance and such the combinations by which the manufacturing party,acting upon the interests of some and the prejudices of others,have obtained a decided and permanent control over public opinion in all the tariff states."Thus,as the Southern statesman would have it,the North,in matters affecting national policies,was ruled by a "confederated interest"which menaced the planting interest.As the former grew in magnitude and attached to itself the free farmers of the West through channels of trade and credit,it followed as night the day that in time the planters would be overshadowed and at length overborne in the struggle of giants.Whether the theory was sound or not,Southern statesmen believed it and acted upon it.
QUESTIONS
1.What signs pointed to a complete Democratic triumph in 1852?
2.What is the explanation of the extraordinary industrial progress of America?
3.Compare the planting system with the factory system.
4.In what sections did industry flourish before the Civil War?Why?
5.Show why transportation is so vital to modern industry and agriculture.
6.Explain how it was possible to secure so many people to labor in American industries.
7.Trace the steps in the rise of organized labor before 1860.
8.What political and economic reforms did labor demand?
9.Why did the East and the South seek closer ties with the West?
