“And then I came into the room. They were discussing botany. I said how I’d seen a flower growing on a dust heap on the site of an old house in Kingsway. The seed, I said, must have been sown in the reign of Charles the First. What flowers grew in the reign of Charles the First?” I asked—(but, I don’t remember the answer). Tall flowers with purple tassels to them perhaps. And so it goes on. All the time I’m dressing up the figure of myself in my own mind, lovingly, stealthily, not openly adoring it, for if I did that, I should catch myself out, and stretch my hand at once for a book in self-protection. Indeed, it is curious how instinctively one protects the image of oneself from idolatry or any other handling that could make it ridiculous, or too unlike the original to be believed in any longer. Or is it not so very curious after all? It is a matter of great importance. Suppose the looking glass smashes, the image disappears, and the romantic figure with the green of forest depths all about it is there no longer, but only that shell of a person which is seen by other people—what an airless, shallow, bald, prominent world it becomes! A world not to be lived in. As we face each other in omnibuses and underground railways we are looking into the mirror that accounts for the vagueness, the gleam of glassiness, in our eyes. And the novelists in future will realize more and more the importance of these reflections, for of course there is not one reflection but an almost infinite number; those are the depths they will explore, those the phantoms they will pursue, leaving the description of reality more and more out of their stories, taking a knowledge of it for granted, as the Greeks did and Shakespeare perhaps—but these generalizations are very worthless. The military sound of the word is enough. It recalls leading articles, cabinet ministers—a whole class of things indeed which as a child one thought the thing itself, the standard thing, the real thing, from which one could not depart save at the risk of nameless damnation. Generalizations bring back somehow Sunday in London, Sunday afternoon walks, Sunday luncheons, and also ways of speaking of the dead, clothes, and habits— like the habit of sitting all together in one room until a certain hour,although nobody liked it. There was a rule for everything. The rule for tablecloths at that particular period was that they should be made of tapestry with little yellow compartments marked upon them, such as you may see in photographs of the carpets in the corridors of the royal palaces. Tablecloths of a different kind were not real tablecloths. How shocking, and yet how wonderful it was to discover that these real things, Sunday luncheons, Sunday walks, country houses, and tablecloths were not entirely real, were indeed half phantoms, and the damnation which visited the disbeliever in them was only a sense of illegitimate freedom. What now takes the place of those things I wonder, those real standard things? Men perhaps, should you be a woman; the masculine point of view which governs our lives, which sets the standard, which establishes Whitaker’s Table of Precedency, which has become, I suppose, since the war half a phantom to many men and women, which soon—one may hope, will be laughed into the dustbin where the phantoms go, the mahogany sideboards and the Landseer prints, Gods and Devils, Hell and so forth, leaving us all with an intoxicating sense of illegitimate freedom— if freedom exists…In certain lights that mark on the wall seems actually to project from the wall. Nor is it entirely circular. I cannot be sure, but it seems to cast a perceptible shadow, suggesting that if I ran my finger down that strip of the wall it would, at a certain point, mount and descend a small tumulus, a smooth tumulus like those barrows on the South Downs which are, they say, either tombs or camps. Of the two I should prefer them to be tombs, desiring melancholy like most English people, and finding it natural at the end of a walk to think of the bones stretched beneath the turf… There must be some book about it. Some antiquary must have dug up those bones and given them a name… What sort of a man is an antiquary, I wonder? Retired Colonels for the most part, I daresay, leading parties of aged labourers to the top here, examining clods of earth and stone, and getting into correspondence with the neighbouring clergy, which,being opened at breakfast time, gives them a feeling of importance, and the comparison of arrow-heads necessitates cross-country journeys to the county towns, an agreeable necessity both to them and to their elderly wives, who wish to make plum jam or to clean out the study, and have every reason for keeping that great question of the camp or the tomb in perpetual suspension, while the Colonel himself feels agreeably philosophic in accumulating evidence on both sides of the question. It is true that he does finally incline to believe in the camp; and, being opposed, indites a pamphlet which he is about to read at the quarterly meeting of the local society when a stroke lays him low, and his last conscious thoughts are not of wife or child, but of the camp and that arrowhead there, which is now in the case at the local museum, together with the foot of a Chinese murderess, a handful of Elizabethan nails, a great many Tudor clay pipes, a piece of Roman pottery, and the wine-glass that Nelson drank out of— proving I really don’t know what.
同类推荐
新课程师资培训教程-高二语文优秀课例
为新课程实施和提高教师专业化水平而精心编写,选取了大量教案,内容上充分体现了知识性和趣味性。接受课改新理念,感受课改新思维,使用课改新教材,至始至终课改给人一种焕然一新的感觉。它是一次革命,一场对话,一座平台,一把迈向成功教育的钥匙。西游记(青少年无障碍阅读)
《西游记》是我国文学史上第一部浪漫主义长篇神魔小说,主要写孙悟空、猪八戒、沙僧三人保护唐僧西行取经的故事。师徒们行程十万八千里,历经九九八十一难,一路降妖除魔,最后终于到达西天,取得真经。作者以积极浪漫主义的创作手法,反映现实主义的思想感情,将善意的嘲笑、辛辣的讽刺和严肃的批判巧妙结合,开启了神魔长篇章回小说的新门类。书中运用奇特大胆的想象,描绘了一个色彩缤纷、神奇瑰丽的幻想世界,创造了一系列曲折纷呈、妙趣横生的神话故事,并在奇幻世界中折射出世态人情和世俗情怀,表现了鲜活的人间智慧,在奇幻中透出浓郁的生活气息。新课标课外快乐阅读丛书——快乐心灵的哲学故事
快乐阅读,陶冶心灵,这对于提高广大中小学生的阅读写作能力,培养语文素养,促进终身学习等都具有深远的意义。现代中小学生不能只局限于校园和课本,应该广开视野,广长见识,广泛了解博大的世界和社会,不断增加丰富的现代社会知识和世界信息,才能有所精神准备,才能迅速地长大,将来才能够自由地翱翔于世界的蓝天。中小学生综合实践活动-青春期心理
综合实践活动是现代教育中的个性内容、体验内容和反思内容,与传统教育片面追求教育个体的发展、共性和知识有所不同,综合实践活动提供了一个相对独立的学习生态化空间,学生是这个空间的主导者,学生具有整个活动绝对的支配权和主导权,能够以自我和团队为中心,推动活动的进行。在这个过程中,学生更谋求独立完成整个活动,而不是聆听教诲和听取指导。教师在综合实践活动这个生态化空间里,只是一个绝对的引导者、指导者和旁观者。
热门推荐